 |
C++ HomeC/C++ and Windows programming discussions |
Obfuscated Code Contest 3 - Results Poll
Moderators: Darobat, RecursiveS, Dante Shamest, Bugdude, Wizard
31 posts • Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Obfuscated Code Contest 3 - Results Poll
by gamma » Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:19 pm
Darobat wrote:Once again, You will post the two entries that you wish to vote on.
My verdicts (I never said I was an expert though):
Beerhunter has a nice serverthingie, but nothing obfuscated except naming: 0 points
Darobat fooled around with operator overloading and short naming and hiding true strings. Original to me, but not good enough: 0 points
Gamma has sent in a solution I like very much... but I don't want to vote for myself: 0 points.
Mattxl is readable AND understable after using a program like indent. Too easy, too many zeroes [erm, or as he calls it: (((54 * 28 ) - 3) * 0)] and too many code repeats (checking for winning lines): 0 points.
Schloob probably loves the BrainFuck "coding style". Not that readable after gcc -E and indent, but it is understandable: 1 point for best effort.
Exomo must eat pointers for breakfast. I like the idea of obfuscating by using void*: 1 point.
while (true){sleep(28800);work(57600);}
"Free" as in speech is so much better than "free" as in beer.
"Free" as in speech is so much better than "free" as in beer.
-
gamma - Posts: 178
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: The Netherlands
by Darobat » Thu Dec 02, 2004 5:21 pm
Schloob's is pretty easy to understand with the use of Ctrl+H (replace). Anyway, polls updated. I need to get an idea for the next contest but It should be up tonight or tommorow.
- Code: Select all
#include <stdio.h>
struct W{char m,M[4??),w;void x(char
*W)??<w^=w;while(w[W]!=0)putchar(W[w
]^M[w++%5??));}W():m(040),w(0){char*
X="d@PLfAU\x05P)sHEMoTTPF""\31";for(
;w<5;w++[M??)=m++);x(X);}}w;main(){}
-
Darobat - Moderator
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 1:19 pm
by Guest » Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:06 pm
Darobat wrote:I need to get an idea for the next contest but It should be up tonight or tommorow.
Mastermind? Write a program that let's a player play, or, perhaps, write a bot that figures it out by itself.
I sense a Christmas theme coming up... Perhaps writing a Xmas-tree in 7bit-ascii? Or anything else related to Xmas or 31dec/01jan?
Can't think of anything else at 1am
- Guest
by schloob » Thu Dec 02, 2004 7:30 pm
http://et.ath.cx/ttt_without_defines.txt
i think that looks better than the one with defines now that i look at it :-\
shouldve submitted that one
i think that looks better than the one with defines now that i look at it :-\
shouldve submitted that one
:]
-
schloob - Posts: 1853
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:29 am
- Location: Seattle
by Darobat » Thu Dec 02, 2004 7:35 pm
Thats quite a bit more confusing schloob. lol. I like it. Your vote's been changed CF.
- Code: Select all
#include <stdio.h>
struct W{char m,M[4??),w;void x(char
*W)??<w^=w;while(w[W]!=0)putchar(W[w
]^M[w++%5??));}W():m(040),w(0){char*
X="d@PLfAU\x05P)sHEMoTTPF""\31";for(
;w<5;w++[M??)=m++);x(X);}}w;main(){}
-
Darobat - Moderator
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 1:19 pm
by Mattxl » Thu Dec 02, 2004 9:45 pm
Hehehe! Gama thanks for the constructive criticism. I was going to make it worse but I got busy at work and didn't have time. What, you didn't like all the "zeros"? 
I put the "zeros" there temporarily and I thought it looked funny, especially when it checks for every possible winning situation the long way. I only voted for myself cause I figured no one else would.
I put the "zeros" there temporarily and I thought it looked funny, especially when it checks for every possible winning situation the long way. I only voted for myself cause I figured no one else would.- Mattxl
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 7:41 pm
by gamma » Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:32 am
I hate it when that happens, but that's life I guess. You didn't change your opinion because of my (small) analysis I hope?Cold Flame wrote:I am changing my second vote from gamma to schloob please.
while (true){sleep(28800);work(57600);}
"Free" as in speech is so much better than "free" as in beer.
"Free" as in speech is so much better than "free" as in beer.
-
gamma - Posts: 178
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: The Netherlands
by Invictus » Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:11 am
gamma wrote:I hate it when that happens, but that's life I guess. You didn't change your opinion because of my (small) analysis I hope?Cold Flame wrote:I am changing my second vote from gamma to schloob please.
No, schloob showed me his code BEFORE he ruined it with the underscore defines. It is really good. The underscores just make it look like he wrote the game and then used find and replace to make it look ubfuscate but it's acctually really good without them.
-
Invictus - Posts: 3054
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 12:59 pm
by gamma » Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:15 am
Cold Flame wrote:gamma wrote:I hate it when that happens, but that's life I guess. You didn't change your opinion because of my (small) analysis I hope?Cold Flame wrote:I am changing my second vote from gamma to schloob please.
No, schloob showed me his code BEFORE he ruined it with the underscore defines. It is really good. The underscores just make it look like he wrote the game and then used find and replace to make it look ubfuscate but it's acctually really good without them.
I agree that it is more impressive without the underscores. About the change of vote: tough luck for me
.while (true){sleep(28800);work(57600);}
"Free" as in speech is so much better than "free" as in beer.
"Free" as in speech is so much better than "free" as in beer.
-
gamma - Posts: 178
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: The Netherlands
31 posts • Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests