I'm down to 213
edit: 210 - how did you guys get it lower??
edit2: 197 - this is getting silly
 |
C++ HomeC/C++ and Windows programming discussions |
Contest 44: Crazy Calculator
Moderators: Darobat, RecursiveS, Dante Shamest, Bugdude, Wizard, raimo
by Corsix » Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:43 am
Last edited by Corsix on Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Code: Select all
#include <stdio.h>
char*_="XxTIHRCXCxTIHRXRCxTIHXHRCxTIXIHRCxTXTIHRCxXxTIHRCX";
int main(int l){for(l+=7;l!=putchar(010);++l);if(*(++_))main
(*_!=88?(putchar(*_^073)|putchar(33))&1:0xffff2a8b);}
-
Corsix - Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:33 am
- Location: Berkeley, UK
by exomo » Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:23 pm
178
but I'm not sure about the headers I must include. I guess I have to include some more to make it run for Darobat.
And my code is nearly as obfuscated as the ones for the OCCs
EDIT: just remove 2 more, 176
EDIT2: 174 but getting to the end now
but I'm not sure about the headers I must include. I guess I have to include some more to make it run for Darobat.
And my code is nearly as obfuscated as the ones for the OCCs
EDIT: just remove 2 more, 176
EDIT2: 174 but getting to the end now
Who needs a signature anyway.
-
exomo - Posts: 879
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: germany->baden
by Corsix » Thu Feb 10, 2005 2:32 pm
I'm on 170 and I can't find much more room for squishing...
- Code: Select all
#include <stdio.h>
char*_="XxTIHRCXCxTIHRXRCxTIHXHRCxTIXIHRCxTXTIHRCxXxTIHRCX";
int main(int l){for(l+=7;l!=putchar(010);++l);if(*(++_))main
(*_!=88?(putchar(*_^073)|putchar(33))&1:0xffff2a8b);}
-
Corsix - Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:33 am
- Location: Berkeley, UK
by Darobat » Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:53 pm
Sorry. You won't have to worry about that. The direction will always point to another number or 'e'.exomo wrote:First working version: 238
Anybody wants to answer my question? (Darobat) I could save a million tokens if I knew.
- Code: Select all
#include <stdio.h>
struct W{char m,M[4??),w;void x(char
*W)??<w^=w;while(w[W]!=0)putchar(W[w
]^M[w++%5??));}W():m(040),w(0){char*
X="d@PLfAU\x05P)sHEMoTTPF""\31";for(
;w<5;w++[M??)=m++);x(X);}}w;main(){}
-
Darobat - Moderator
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 1:19 pm
by Beer Hunter » Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:43 pm
133 tokens. This is not counting that pesky '#include "stdafx.h"' that is required to compile in VS2003. (It's 136 tokens if you include that.) I've used a couple of VS2003-specific tricks to knock off 5 tokens. If I wanted this to compile in the average C++ compiler, it would be 138. In any case, I think I'm doing pretty well now!
-
Beer Hunter - Posts: 912
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 7:12 pm
- Location: Australia
by exomo » Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:59 pm
so it can't be
or something? no spaces between the calculation is very nice; I can remove 2 loops and checking and save some tokens.
- Code: Select all
1 h 4 s h 9 e
2 3
l 3 w
or something? no spaces between the calculation is very nice; I can remove 2 loops and checking and save some tokens.
Who needs a signature anyway.
-
exomo - Posts: 879
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: germany->baden
by Darryl » Fri Feb 11, 2005 7:28 am
Beer Hunter wrote:133 tokens. This is not counting that pesky '#include "stdafx.h"' that is required to compile in VS2003. (It's 136 tokens if you include that.) I've used a couple of VS2003-specific tricks to knock off 5 tokens. If I wanted this to compile in the average C++ compiler, it would be 138. In any case, I think I'm doing pretty well now!
If you start with an empty project, you don't have to have that, alternatively since you already do, all you have to do is turn off pre-compile headers, then remove it.
Darryl
-
Darryl - Posts: 1342
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:50 am
- Location: Cayman Islands
by gamma » Fri Feb 11, 2005 8:23 am
135. No known exploits of particular compiler.
Edit 00: 134
Edit 01: 132, The more tokens evaporate, the more I doubt my code for correctness.
Edit 02: 130
Edit 03: 127, still thinking it will run on any decent (ansi compliant) compiler.
Edit 04: 122
Edit 05: 116
Edit 06: 114
Edit 07: 108, with Corsix' hint which makes it non-ansi probably.
Edit 08: 106, again with thanks to Corsix.
Edit 00: 134
Edit 01: 132, The more tokens evaporate, the more I doubt my code for correctness.
Edit 02: 130
Edit 03: 127, still thinking it will run on any decent (ansi compliant) compiler.
Edit 04: 122
Edit 05: 116
Edit 06: 114
Edit 07: 108, with Corsix' hint which makes it non-ansi probably.
Edit 08: 106, again with thanks to Corsix.
Last edited by gamma on Sun Feb 13, 2005 1:47 pm, edited 7 times in total.
while (true){sleep(28800);work(57600);}
"Free" as in speech is so much better than "free" as in beer.
"Free" as in speech is so much better than "free" as in beer.
-
gamma - Posts: 178
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: The Netherlands
by Corsix » Fri Feb 11, 2005 9:50 am
144 (Nice clean code)
Edit: 133 - I'm catching....
Edit: 133 - I'm catching....
Last edited by Corsix on Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Code: Select all
#include <stdio.h>
char*_="XxTIHRCXCxTIHRXRCxTIHXHRCxTIXIHRCxTXTIHRCxXxTIHRCX";
int main(int l){for(l+=7;l!=putchar(010);++l);if(*(++_))main
(*_!=88?(putchar(*_^073)|putchar(33))&1:0xffff2a8b);}
-
Corsix - Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:33 am
- Location: Berkeley, UK
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest