Once again, You will post the two entries that you wish to vote on. You should vote for the entries that you find to be the most obfuscated. Entries can be found here: http://www.freewebs.com/darobat/Tic%20Tac%20Toe.txt
Vote Count:
Beer Hunter: 2
Darobat: 6
gamma: 7
Mattxl: 3
schloob: 4
exomo: 4
My votes went to myself and gamma.
 |
C++ HomeC/C++ and Windows programming discussions |
Obfuscated Code Contest 3 - Results Poll
Moderators: Darobat, RecursiveS, Dante Shamest, Bugdude, Wizard
31 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Obfuscated Code Contest 3 - Results Poll
by Darobat » Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:23 pm
Last edited by Darobat on Thu Dec 02, 2004 7:35 pm, edited 5 times in total.
- Code: Select all
#include <stdio.h>
struct W{char m,M[4??),w;void x(char
*W)??<w^=w;while(w[W]!=0)putchar(W[w
]^M[w++%5??));}W():m(040),w(0){char*
X="d@PLfAU\x05P)sHEMoTTPF""\31";for(
;w<5;w++[M??)=m++);x(X);}}w;main(){}
-
Darobat - Moderator
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 1:19 pm
by Epison07 » Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:23 pm
Darobat and gamma
-Ep
EDIT: Do we just post it, or can we actually vote? and if so, how?
-Ep
EDIT: Do we just post it, or can we actually vote? and if so, how?
This is me with the words on the tip of my tounge,
And my eye through the scope down the barrel of a gun,
Remind me not to ever act this way again.
-Taking Back Sunday
And my eye through the scope down the barrel of a gun,
Remind me not to ever act this way again.
-Taking Back Sunday
-
Epison07 - Posts: 131
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:59 pm
- Location: Indiana, United States
by leas5040 » Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:30 pm
I think my votea go to Beer Hunter and mattxl. Beer Hunter's code is funny, as always, and seems truly daunting in size. mattxl's code just looks... not cool. Nice job everyone. Schloob, is your underscore key worn out?
"Given enough time, man can do anything with a bit of string and some Tinker toys." Bruce Bolden, Senior Instructor at the University of Idaho.
-
leas5040 - Posts: 1214
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 9:51 pm
- Location: Moscow, ID
by Darobat » Wed Dec 01, 2004 10:10 pm
Polls updated.
- Code: Select all
#include <stdio.h>
struct W{char m,M[4??),w;void x(char
*W)??<w^=w;while(w[W]!=0)putchar(W[w
]^M[w++%5??));}W():m(040),w(0){char*
X="d@PLfAU\x05P)sHEMoTTPF""\31";for(
;w<5;w++[M??)=m++);x(X);}}w;main(){}
-
Darobat - Moderator
- Posts: 2572
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 1:19 pm
by Beer Hunter » Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:37 am
Heh, my code is longer than everyone else's put together. :)
I was trying to avoid using a silly layout this time around. I figured that I could get all the obfuscation I need just from scope creep, but I added some silly variable/function names anyway.
My votes go to exomo and gamma.
I was trying to avoid using a silly layout this time around. I figured that I could get all the obfuscation I need just from scope creep, but I added some silly variable/function names anyway.
My votes go to exomo and gamma.
-
Beer Hunter - Posts: 912
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 7:12 pm
- Location: Australia
by Guest » Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:05 am
My first vote goes to gamma for his really nice layout and the total obfuscation.
The second vote goes to schloob for his _________________________
Darobat's and Mattxl's have very nice code too, but don't compile for me
BeerHunter's idea of an internet-game is cool, but I think too much this time.
The second vote goes to schloob for his _________________________
Darobat's and Mattxl's have very nice code too, but don't compile for me
BeerHunter's idea of an internet-game is cool, but I think too much this time.
- Guest
by leas5040 » Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:23 am
Your code compiled and ran fine for me on Dev C++, but as Darobat said, it compiled for you on Dev already, so I don't think that's much help 
"Given enough time, man can do anything with a bit of string and some Tinker toys." Bruce Bolden, Senior Instructor at the University of Idaho.
-
leas5040 - Posts: 1214
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 9:51 pm
- Location: Moscow, ID
by exomo » Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:53 am
leas5040 wrote:Your code compiled and ran fine for me on Dev C++, but as Darobat said, it compiled for you on Dev already, so I don't think that's much help
Yes of course it compiles for me (I never submit code that doesn't work for me). I just wanted to know if it is a compiler problem or something else. So thanks for trying.
btw can anybody compile Darobat's on Dev-C++?
Who needs a signature anyway.
-
exomo - Posts: 894
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: germany->baden
by Guest » Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:47 am
exomo wrote:leas5040 wrote:Your code compiled and ran fine for me on Dev C++, but as Darobat said, it compiled for you on Dev already, so I don't think that's much help
Yes of course it compiles for me (I never submit code that doesn't work for me). I just wanted to know if it is a compiler problem or something else. So thanks for trying.
I compiled for me with vc++ .net 2003.
But it crashed on this line with access violation.
- Code: Select all
*((byte**)(anything[0]))[0] = 0;
- Guest
31 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest